CCAMLR-SM-III/01 More Info |
Draft conservation measure for a Weddell Sea Marine Protected Area – Phase 1 Delegations of the EU and its Member States, Norway, Uruguay, Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, the USA, Republic of Korea, India, Ukraine and Chile |
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/02 More Info |
Draft conservation measure for an East Antarctic Marine Protected Area Delegations of Australia, the European Union and its Member States, India, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the USA and Uruguay |
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/03 More Info |
CCAMLR marine protected areas: multiple objectives for a representative system Delegation of the EU and its Member States |
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/04 More Info |
MPA Management and Research and Monitoring Plans: Objectives, key elements and linkages Delegation of the EU and its Member States |
3 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/05 More Info |
Proposal on the way forward for CCAMLR MPA Process Delegation of the People’s Republic of China |
2 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/06 More Info |
Revised proposal for a Conservation Measure establishing a Marine Protected Area in Domain 1 (Western Antarctic Peninsula and South Scotia Arc) Delegations of Argentina and Chile
Abstract:
This paper is submitted to the Third Special Meeting of the Commission on spatial planning and marine protected areas (CCAMLR–SM-III), which will be held in Santiago de Chile from 19 to 23 June, 2023.
This paper contains the proposed draft Read More
Submitted By:
Mr Javier De Cicco (Argentina)
Approved By:
Mr Fausto Lopez Crozet (Argentina)
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/07 More Info |
Draft amendment to Conservation Measures CM 91-04 (2011) General Framework for the establishment of CCAMLR Marine Protected Areas Delegation of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
We present a draft amendment to CM 91-04 in line with the position of the Russian Federation that has been repeatedly expressed at Commission meetings. Annexes A, B, C and D to CM 91-04 are included in the draft CM 91-04.
Submitted By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Approved By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Request Meeting Document
|
3 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/08 More Info |
Comments on the status of the South Orkney Islands southern shelf Marine Protected Area (SOISS MPA) Delegation of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
The South Orkney Islands Southern Shelf Marine Protected Area (SOISS MPA), established by CCAMLR at the initiative of the United Kingdom in Subarea 48.2, has existed for over 13 years (CM 91-03, 2009). However, several scientific and legal aspects of this MPA, the first MPA established by CCAMLR, remain unclear. Providing clarity on the status of this MPA seems essential Read More
Submitted By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Approved By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Request Meeting Document
|
2 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/09 More Info |
Comments and suggestions on the draft Ross Sea region MPA Research and Monitoring Plan Delegation of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
The Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area has existed for over six years (CM 91-05, 2016). However, the Research and Monitoring Plan remains to be adopted, and there needs to be more clarity on several aspects of the scientific rationale for this MPA. The Russian Federation offers comments on the draft RSr MPA Research and Monitoring Plan based on its position voiced at previous CCAMLR Read More
Submitted By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Approved By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/10 More Info |
Suggestions for establishing Marine Protected Areas in the CCAMLR Convention Area: regulation of the uniform process for establishing MPAs and the Commission’s management of MPAs Delegation of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
Based on an analysis of the legal and scientific aspects of the current situation regarding establishing MPAs in the Convention Area, this paper considers procedural and implementation measures to manage a single process for the scientifically based designation of MPAs and to regulate their operation by the CCAMLR Commission.
The Russian Federation deems it crucial for the Commission Read More
Submitted By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Approved By:
Dr Svetlana Kasatkina (Russian Federation)
Request Meeting Document
|
5 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/11 More Info |
Proposal for a roadmap to advance in the process of developing a representative system of marine protected areas in the Convention Area Delegations of Argentina and Chile
Abstract:
The present working paper proposes a way forward to advance in the designation of Marine Protected Areas. Taking into consideration the existence of consensus and political will amongst the Members to create a representative system of MPAs, the present document proposes as key elements of a way forward a reiteration of the political will to create a representative MPA system; a realistic Read More
Submitted By:
Mr Sebastián Molina (Chile)
Approved By:
Mr Sebastián Molina (Chile)
Request Meeting Document
|
5 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/12 More Info |
Developing SMART criteria, with baselines and decision rules, to evaluate CCAMLR MPAs Delegation of the USA
Abstract:
Establishing criteria to assess the effectiveness of CCAMLR marine protected areas (MPAs) can resolve issues currently preventing consensus to establish MPAs in East Antarctica, the Weddell Sea, and Planning Domain 1. SMART criteria express desired outcomes in terms of performance Read More
Submitted By:
Dr George Watters (United States of America)
Approved By:
Ms Elizabeth Phelps (United States of America)
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/13 More Info |
The methodology used for WSMPA Phase 2 and some recommendations to assist in future CCAMLR MPA planning Delegation of Norway
Abstract:
This paper presents a summary of the decision support framework and methodology that Norway has used to guide the scientific basis for a proposal for WSMPA Phase 2. We also provide some recommendations from our approach that Norway hopes members will find useful to assist in CCAMLR MPA discussions.
Submitted By:
Dr Cecilie von Quillfeldt (Norway)
Approved By:
Ms Mette Strengehagen (Norway)
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/01 More Info |
Candidate SMART criteria, with baselines and decision rules, for the Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area G.M. Watters
Abstract:
This document presents 46 candidate SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound) criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area (RSRMPA). Each criterion links to a specific objective from CM 91-05 paragraph 3, a generic objective Read More
Submitted By:
Dr George Watters (United States of America)
Approved By:
Ms Elizabeth Phelps (United States of America)
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/02 More Info |
Collation of existing CCAMLR documents and discussions on marine protected areas CCAMLR Secretariat
Abstract:
This document provides a history of the development of spatial planning and marine protected areas in CCAMLR from the earliest approaches in the 1990s, through the development of bioregionalization and MPA discussions in the 2000s and the adoption of the three existing Conservation Measures on MPAs, through to the present day discussions. It Read More
Submitted By:
Dr David Agnew (CCAMLR Secretariat)
Approved By:
Dr David Agnew (CCAMLR Secretariat)
Request Meeting Document
|
2 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/03 More Info |
Great Expectations: Moving towards consensus on CCAMLR MPAs in 2023 Submitted by ASOC
Abstract:
All three of the MPA proposals currently on the table at CCAMLR have gone through years of iterations, and Member States’ feedback, concerns and requests have been taken into account. During this time, additional Member States have joined these proposals as co-proponents. In this paper, ASOC provides an overview of how MPA proposals have changed over Read More
Submitted By:
Ms Claire Christian
Approved By:
Ms Claire Christian
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/04 More Info |
From Bremerhaven to Santiago: Reflections on CCAMLR MPA discussions Submitted by ASOC
Abstract:
Several documents submitted by ASOC to the CCAMLR Special Meeting II in Bremerhaven, Germany in 2013 discussed key topics related to MPA design and function: duration of MPAs, the precautionary principle, the climate benefits of MPAs, and the opportunity MPAs presented to CCAMLR. In this paper, ASOC reflects on how discussions since CCAMLR-SM-II have Read More
Submitted By:
Ms Claire Christian
Approved By:
Ms Claire Christian
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/05 More Info |
Marine Protected Areas and the original meaning of the CAMLR Convention Submitted by ASOC
Abstract:
The distinguishing feature of the CAMLR Convention is its conservation mandate. However, in recent years, the implementation of this mandate has been inconsistent, and some CCAMLR Members apply a greater burden of proof to conservation-oriented proposals (such as proposed MPAs) than they apply to fishing proposals. In this paper, ASOC discusses CCAMLR’s approach to Article II Read More
Submitted By:
Ms Claire Christian
Approved By:
Ms Claire Christian
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/06 More Info |
The Oceanographic Institute, Foundation Albert I, Prince of Monaco – Statement of intent and commitment Submitted by ASOC
Abstract:
The Oceanographic Institute of Monaco, a member organization of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), announces the scaling up of their involvement in Antarctic and Southern Ocean public awareness and conservation efforts through a tailored programme over the next 2.5 years, in the lead up to the 3rd United Nations Ocean Conference Read More
Submitted By:
Ms Claire Christian
Approved By:
Ms Claire Christian
Request Meeting Document
|
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/07 More Info |
Ross Sea Region Marine Protected Area Research and Monitoring Plan Delegations of New Zealand and Italy |
4 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/08 More Info |
The importance of marine protected areas in enhancing ecosystem resilience to climate change impacts Submitted by SCAR |
2 |
CCAMLR-SM-III/BG/09 More Info |
Comments on CCAMLR MPA process: the need for overarching targets Submitted by ARK |
4 |